UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW

The Corresponence of James McNeil Whistler
Home > On-line Edition > Transcription/Database Record

the on-line edition

System Number: 01435
Date: 9 May [1867][1]
Author: Edward Forbes[2]
Place: Paris
Recipient: William McNeill Whistler[3]
Place: [Paris]
Repository: Glasgow Unversity Library
Call Number: Whistler F367
Document Type: ALS[4]


229 Faubourg St Honoré
Paris

May 9th

My dear Sir

In answer to yours[5] just recieved [sic], I beg to say that full leave is always given to perform service[6] at all funerals,

It must have been either ignorance or neglect of those concerned, thus omitting it in the case you allude to

Believe me
Yours very faithfully

Edward Forbes


This document is protected by copyright.


Notes:

1.  9 May [1867]
Dated from references to the death of J. Traer; see note below.

2.  Edward Forbes
Rev. Edward Forbes (1817-1882), Chaplain of the English church in Paris [more].

3.  William Gibbs Whistler
William McNeill Whistler (1836-1900), physician, JW's brother [more].

4.  ALS
A copy of this letter appears in 'A. B.' to J. G. Wakeley, #02473.

5.  yours
See W. G. Whistler to E. Forbes, #06996.

6.  service
A reference to the funeral of James Reeves Traer (ca 1834 - d.1867), partner in F. S. Haden's medical practice [more], in Paris. On 23 April 1867, Traer died during a trip to Paris of alcohol related causes (see document signed A. Brierre de Boismont, #11801). Francis Seymour Haden (1818-1910), surgeon and etcher, JW's brother-in-law [more], arranged for Traer's burial, in what JW and Willie Whistler regarded as a disrespectful and perfunctory manner. Traer was buried with minimal ceremony and cost in a municipal cemetery in Paris (see W. G. Whistler to D. D. Haden, #06994). The incident led to a permanent rift between the Haden and Whistler families. According to W. G. Whistler (see letter to JW, #06995), his letter to D. D. Haden, #06994, was returned, annotated by F. S. Haden: 'No protestant service allowed in a catholic burying ground.' But Willie was sceptical about Haden's statement and wrote to Forbes (#06996) in order to clarify the matter.